Download Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, by Paul Bloom
Positions now this Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom as one of your book collection! Yet, it is not in your cabinet collections. Why? This is the book Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom that is supplied in soft file. You could download and install the soft data of this stunning book Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom currently and in the link supplied. Yeah, various with the other people that seek book Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom outside, you can get less complicated to pose this book. When some individuals still walk right into the establishment and also browse the book Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom, you are here just stay on your seat and get the book Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom.
Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, by Paul Bloom
Download Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, by Paul Bloom
Some individuals might be chuckling when checking out you reviewing Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom in your downtime. Some could be appreciated of you. And also some might want resemble you who have reading hobby. Exactly what regarding your own feel? Have you really felt right? Reading Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom is a demand and also a hobby at the same time. This problem is the on that will certainly make you really feel that you need to read. If you know are searching for the book entitled Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom as the choice of reading, you could find below.
This is why we recommend you to consistently visit this web page when you require such book Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom, every book. By online, you might not go to get guide shop in your city. By this on the internet collection, you can discover guide that you actually want to review after for long time. This Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom, as one of the suggested readings, tends to remain in soft data, as all of book collections here. So, you may also not get ready for couple of days later on to receive and also read guide Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom.
The soft data indicates that you need to visit the web link for downloading and install and then save Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom You have actually possessed guide to review, you have actually postured this Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom It is simple as going to the book shops, is it? After getting this brief description, hopefully you could download one and also begin to read Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom This book is really simple to review each time you have the downtime.
It's no any mistakes when others with their phone on their hand, and also you're as well. The difference could last on the product to open up Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom When others open up the phone for chatting as well as chatting all things, you could sometimes open as well as review the soft file of the Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom Certainly, it's unless your phone is available. You can also make or save it in your laptop or computer that alleviates you to review Against Empathy: The Case For Rational Compassion, By Paul Bloom.
New York Post Best Book of 2016
We often think of our capacity to experience the suffering of others as the ultimate source of goodness. Many of our wisest policy-makers, activists, scientists, and philosophers agree that the only problem with empathy is that we don’t have enough of it.
Nothing could be farther from the truth, argues Yale researcher Paul Bloom. In AGAINST EMPATHY, Bloom reveals empathy to be one of the leading motivators of inequality and immorality in society. Far from helping us to improve the lives of others, empathy is a capricious and irrational emotion that appeals to our narrow prejudices. It muddles our judgment and, ironically, often leads to cruelty. We are at our best when we are smart enough not to rely on it, but to draw instead upon a more distanced compassion.
Basing his argument on groundbreaking scientific findings, Bloom makes the case that some of the worst decisions made by individuals and nations—who to give money to, when to go to war, how to respond to climate change, and who to imprison—are too often motivated by honest, yet misplaced, emotions. With precision and wit, he demonstrates how empathy distorts our judgment in every aspect of our lives, from philanthropy and charity to the justice system; from medical care and education to parenting and marriage. Without empathy, Bloom insists, our decisions would be clearer, fairer, and—yes—ultimately more moral.
Brilliantly argued, urgent and humane, AGAINST EMPATHY shows us that, when it comes to both major policy decisions and the choices we make in our everyday lives, limiting our impulse toward empathy is often the most compassionate choice we can make.
- Sales Rank: #5828 in Books
- Published on: 2016-12-06
- Released on: 2016-12-06
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 8.25" h x 1.01" w x 5.50" l, .0 pounds
- Binding: Hardcover
- 304 pages
Amazon.com Review
An Amazon Best Book of December 2016: Raise your hand if you're against empathy. No one…? Paul Bloom freely admits that taking a stance against empathy is a position that most people will shun. But as Bloom lays out his argument for why rational analysis, morality, and compassion are better compass points to follow for making the world a better place, indeed, empathy begins to sound like a miserable basis for decision-making. Parenting, charity, psychotherapy, and war all come under Bloom's scrutiny, and with a wry voice and lots of examples, he knocks down one by one the arguments for why empathy would create better outcomes. Careful to draw the line between compassion and empathy, Bloom can sometimes sound like he's retreading the same argument's path, but his tongue-in-cheek asides keep the book entertaining and drew me to the end long after I'd come to agree with his premise. For those who want to understand better how the heart and head battle for supremacy and which organ should be a better guide, this is a counterintuitive approach that's as entertaining to read as it is informative. --Adrian Liang, The Amazon Book Review
Review
“An invigorating, relevant and often very funny re-evaluation of empathy, one of our culture’s most ubiquitous sacred cows, which in Mr. Bloom’s view should be gently led to the abattoir.” (New York Times)
“Provocative . . . In a time of post-truth politics, his book offers a much-needed call for facts.” (The Economist)
“Cleverly contrarian…” (New York Post)
“A lucidly argued tract about the hazards of good intentions.” (Vox)
“Like a tough-to-crack case against an idea that most of us have long known is key to repairing the world… will legitimately change how you think about the world and your own sense of morality.” (New York Magazine)
“Mr. Bloom is undoubtedly right that empathy alone makes for bad policy: While it can motivate us to care, we need reason to help us design and implement policies aimed at reducing suffering.” (Wall Street Journal)
“A nuanced foray into some fraught grey areas.” (Nature)
“Refreshing.” (Library Journal)
“Provocative… and powerful.” (Publishers Weekly)
“Bloom’s more positive view of the role of reason fits with what I take to be the correct understanding of ethics.” (Project Syndicate)
“An intriguing counterattack to modern psychological cynicism.” (Kirkus)
“Bloom challenges one of our most cherished assumptions about what it takes to be good. With elegance and humor, Bloom reveals just how flawed that assumption is, and offers a new vision of a moral life-one based on how our minds actually work.” (Carl Zimmer, author of Evolution: Making Sense of Life)
“Bloom’s analysis is penetrating, comprehensive, and timely. Against Empathy is destined to become a classic in psychology.” (Michael Shermer, Publisher Skeptic magazine, monthly columnist Scientific American, and author of The Moral Arc and The Science of Good and Evil)
“Despite a near consensus about its merits, Bloom shows that empathy is often just the warm embrace of prejudice-and, like anger, a reliable source of moral confusion. . . . a thrilling book, and reading it could well make you a better person.” (Sam Harris, author of the New York Times bestsellers The End of Faith, The Moral Landscape, and Waking Up)
“I couldn’t put this brilliantly argued book down.” (Amy Chua, Yale Law Professor and author of Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother and The Triple Package)
“A brilliant, witty, and convincing defense of rational generosity against its pain-feeling detractors. Read this book and you will never think about empathy, goodness, or cold-blooded reason the same way again.”- (Larissa MacFarquhar, author of Strangers Drowning: Grappling with Impossible Idealism, Drastic Choices, and the Overpowering Urge to Help)
“Brilliant, powerful, and provocative, Against Empathy is sure to be one of the most controversial books of our time.” (Daniel Gilbert, author of Stumbling on Happiness)
“One of the most thought-provoking and convincing books I’ve read. Bloom’s logic is compelling, his prose fluid, and his deep humanity and compassion always evident. A must-read for those who want an alternative to a world where emotional gambits reign supreme--for better and often, for worse.” (Maria Konnivkova, author of The Confidence Game)
“The title may shock, but this is a book of calm reason and expansive compassion. It’s also a pleasure to read: warm, lucid, and thought-provoking.” (Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University, and author of The Better Angels of Our Nature)
“Bracing and provocative, Against Empathy takes a scalpel to empathy. This lucid and entertaining book argues there is a better way - that our capacity for reason, tempered with compassion, will make us better policy makers and better people.” (Emily Yoffe, author of What the Dog Did)
From the Back Cover
A controversial call to arms by one of the world’s leading psychologists, Against Empathy reveals how the natural impulse to share the feelings� of others can do more harm than good both on the world stage and in our personal lives.
We often think of our capacity to experience the suffering of others as the ultimate source of goodness. Many of our wisest policy makers, activists, scientists, and philosophers agree that the only problem with empathy is that we don’t have enough of it.
Nothing could be further from the truth, argues Yale researcher Paul Bloom. In Against Empathy, Bloom reveals empathy to be one of the leading motivators of inequality and immorality in society. Far from helping us to improve the lives of others, empathy is a capricious and irrational emotion that appeals to our narrow prejudices. It muddles our judgment and, ironically, often leads to cruelty. We are at our best when we are smart enough not to rely on it but to draw instead upon a more distanced compassion.
Basing his argument on groundbreaking scientific findings, Bloom makes the case that some of the worst decisions made by individuals and nations—whom to give money to, when to go to war, how to respond to climate change, and whom to imprison—are too often motivated by honest, yet misplaced, emotions. With precision and wit, he demonstrates how empathy distorts our judgment in every aspect of our lives, from philanthropy and charity to the justice system and from medical care and education to parenting and marriage. Without empathy, Bloom insists, our decisions would be clearer, fairer, and—yes—ultimately more moral.
Brilliantly argued, urgent, and humane, Against Empathy shows us that when it comes to both major policy decisions and the choices we make in our everyday lives limiting our impulse toward empathy is often the most compassionate choice we can make.
Most helpful customer reviews
100 of 105 people found the following review helpful.
Brilliant, provocative, and wildly entertaining
By Amazon Customer
When I picked up this book, I was skeptical. Bloom's counterintuitive claim is that empathy - putting oneself in the shoes of another and feeling what they feel - causes us to make bad moral decisions. How on earth could empathy be a bad thing? But with each chapter, Bloom lays out the prosecution’s case, and by the end, empathy is soundly convicted - it is not useful in helping make the world a better place. Bloom’s argument in a nutshell - empathy is biased, parochial, and irrational. It leads us astray and foils our efforts to make good moral decisions. For example, our emotional brain systems respond to individuals, but aren’t sensitive to their numbers, so they can respond similarly to situations with 2 victims, and situations with 2000 victims. For another example, it’s much easier to empathize with attractive/cute/adorable victims, and with people who resemble our own selves, than with ugly victims and those who differ from us, so empathy leads us to care more about some individuals than other, equally-needy ones. For a third example, it’s impossible to empathize with hypothetical, faceless victims that don’t even exist yet, so our feelings of empathy don’t respond to the plight of future generations - a consideration that's critical for making good public policy decisions (climate change policies, vaccination programs, etc.). There are many other problems with empathy as well, often quite surprising ones.
Importantly, Bloom doesn’t argue that there’s no positive role for empathy in our lives - it’s crucial in our personal relationships for example - but at the larger scale, empathy won’t help make the world a better place, because our emotional systems weren’t designed to help us minimize world suffering, but to motivate us to help our family and friends and to weight them over others. Thus, the subtitle of his book, “The Case for Rational Compassion.” Concern for others’ welfare (compassion) is not the same as feeling what others feel (empathy), and it is the former, Bloom argues, that we need to cultivate to guide our moral decisions in the larger world in which we live - a more distanced, principled stance that involves caring about others, but not favoring some individuals over others. The book has caused me to sit back and try to think much more logically about my own charitable giving, what principles I want to support and where it will do the most good, as opposed to spontaneously giving to random causes that pull my heartstrings. The goal of being a better person, it turns out, is a little like the goal of being a healthy person - you have to resist the easy appealing option junk-food (Cheetos from the vending machine; the adorable baby seal blinking its liquid brown eyes) and go for the more difficult, dispassionate evaluation of nutritional value. What feels good isn’t the same as what is good - for us, and for others.
Bloom's arguments and examples are fascinating, and in addition to being thought-provoking, Bloom is an excellent writer - it’s an engaging, and engrossing, and (somewhat unexpectedly, given its topic) a thoroughly fun and enjoyable read.
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful.
An Important Book I Don't Fully Embrace
By Phil Aud
I thoroughly�enjoyed Paul Bloom's�book Against Empathy. Bloom set out to make his controversial claim that empathy leads to more harm than good. He’s against it. No really, he is. His words: “I am against empathy, and one of the goals of this book is to persuade you to be against empathy too” (p. 3).�I don’t fully agree with his conclusion,�but I do�agree with a great deal of his argument. I’ve been doing some minor research on the topic of empathy which is what drove me to this book. It is en vogue these days to believe that empathy is key to all morality. Religious and philosophical ethics are commonly out the window; empathy is here to save the day. But is it? Is that claim truly justifiable?
First of all it’s important to note that Bloom is not a cold hearted anti-moralist monster. While he states clearly that he is against empathy, it’s important to note what he is for: “rational compassion.” It’s also important to understand his definition of empathy. He writes “the notion of empathy that I’m most interested in is the act of feeling what you believe other people feel–experiencing what they experience. This is how most psychologists and philosophers use the terms” (pp. 3-4).
I don’t want to write about his findings here but simply wish to note that he writes convincingly about the necessary narrow scope of empathy, it’s moral dilemmas, and biases. He also explores the frequent weaknesses of the test cases that apparently “prove” that empathy is our great moral compass. All of that to simply say, he makes a great case and writes a great book. I am going to write a few issues I take with the book, but mostly I thought it was great. My lopsided review is an attempt to leave the content for you and avoid spoilers.
Ultimately I’m persuaded but not fully convinced by Bloom’s argument. I think his categories are a tad too narrow and don’t allow for the overlap which is the integrated human person. I’m sure he would disagree, but perhaps empathy, rationality, and compassion overlap more than the author allows for. I noticed this early in the book when he wrote that “Many of our moral heroes, real and fictional, are not rational maximizers or ethical eggheads; they are people of heart. From Huckleberry Fin to Pip to Jack Bauer, from Jesus to Gandi to Martin Luther King Jr., they are individuals of great feeling” (p. 6) Really? Gandi, MLK, and Jesus were very rational in their ethics. King’s decision not to return violence for violence is about a lot of things, feeling is not one of them. This is a rationally planned decision to override what feeling would tell you in the moment. These men were all men of “heart,” but they were deeply rational. They were integrated. Jesus is perhaps the most rational ethical figure in history (both King and Gandi followed his ethic). Jesus’ ethic cannot be reduced to his golden rule as the author seemed to hint at. (Important to note that this ethic is shared by all major religions.) Neither can it be ignored. Integration seems key. At one point Bloom writes “if a child is starving, it doesn’t really matter whether the food is delivered by a smiling aid worker who hands it over and then gives the kid a hug, or dropped from the sky by a buzzing drone. The niceties of personal contact are far less important than actually saving lives” (p. 106). Well, yes; mainly true. But again, integration is key. Human touch cannot be measured the same way calories can be counted, and while the immediate need is most certainly food that needn’t diminish the long term – though often immeasurable – impact of human touch. Alas, I’m being a bit “nitpicky.” But one more thing.
Quoting James Rachels, “morality is, at the very least, the effort to guide one’s conduct by reason–that is, to do what there are the best reasons for doing–while giving equal weight to the interests of each individual affected by one’s decision” (p. 52) Here the question is which morality? What is the goal (telos) of morality? I certainly have a different telos than Bloom. This became really clear to me in the fifth chapter on “violence and cruelty.” Bloom writes, “unless we are transformed into angels, violence and the threat of violence are needed to rein in our worst instincts” (p. 179). It strikes me, therefore, that rational compassion is massively important, but the question remains: rational compassion towards what? Who’s version of morality? Who is right on their view of the role of violence, me or Bloom? Who decides. This is an important underlying moral question and I was unclear where he stood.
While I may disagree with some of Bloom’s assessments, I believe empathy has been significantly overplayed. Morality is important for every culture to think through and Bloom confronts what many have taken granted in ours. Despite my disagreement on some points, I am grateful for this work and hope it is widely read.
32 of 36 people found the following review helpful.
It makes sense! And it's actually pretty entertaining too.
By Donny Rice
Being someone deeply interested in Brene Brown's works (e.g. "Daring Greatly") on living a wholehearted life and how empathy plays a key role in this, I thought it would be a worthwhile intellectual challenge to read something that goes against that thought. And it was.
What I discovered, though, is that the views are totally reconcilable. Here, Paul Bloom does a fascinating (and frequently entertaining) job at exploring how empathy should be avoided in moral deliberation (e.g. which governmental programs deserve the most funding?). He also has many interesting diversions as he explores topics such as cruelty, romance, and other topics where empathy could appear.
That said, you as the reader can emerge having learned something that actually makes sense, and still recognize the positives of empathy. It would be the same idea as if someone wrote a book discussing the negatives of love, and titled it "Against Love". Just because there are positives associated with the love, doesn't mean that there aren't negatives too. Here's a book about the negatives. Same thing - just replace love for empathy.
One last note is how fascinatingly philosophical the book gets, especially considering how Bloom is a psychologist. His arguments are very utilitarian and consequentialist, and he spends a some time to defend how these are best fitted for logical, compassionate moral deliberation.
Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, by Paul Bloom PDF
Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, by Paul Bloom EPub
Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, by Paul Bloom Doc
Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, by Paul Bloom iBooks
Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, by Paul Bloom rtf
Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, by Paul Bloom Mobipocket
Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, by Paul Bloom Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar